The High Court of Australia heard some damaging statements about Malaysia today:
See this article:
THE Gillard government‘s “Malaysian Solution” has been thrown into disarray after being ruled unlawful by the High Court.
The judgment of the full bench, handed down to a packed courtroom in Canberra, found Immigration Minister Chris Bowen‘s declaration of Malaysia as a country to which asylum-seekers could be sent for processing was “invalid”.
Chief Justice Robert French said the court ordered Mr Bowen and his department be restrained from sending asylum-seekers to Malaysia.
“The declaration made … was made without power and is invalid,” Justice French said.
Lawyers for 41 asylum-seekers were granted a temporary injunction over three weeks ago after appealing against their forced transfer to Kuala Lumpur from Christmas Island.
They were the first group of asylum-seekers to be moved to Malaysia after the government formally signed the new deal in July, which will see 800 boatpeople sent to the country in return for Australia accepting 4000 confirmed refugees from Malaysia.
Debbie Mortimer SC, acting for the group, argued the government’s policy was not lawful because Malaysia was not a signatory to the UN refugee convention and therefore did not provide enough legal protection.
She previously told the High Court in a two-day hearing the plaintiffs were at risk of persecution in Malaysia due to their religious beliefs.
Ms Mortimer also questioned whether Mr Bowen had the power under the law he relied upon to forcibly remove people to another country.
“Fundamental rights are at stake . . . liberty, freedom of movement . . . and freedom from assault,” she said.
“The proposed conduct of the commonwealth intervenes with all three of these rights.”
Ms Mortimer also claimed Mr Bowen would breach his role as guardian by sending unaccompanied minors to Malaysia.
But Commonwealth Solicitor-General Stephen Gageler SC, acting for Mr Bowen, argued Malaysia needed only to guarantee it would not send refugees back home to fulfil protection obligations.
He previously told the court that although Malaysia was not a signatory on UN human rights conventions, “the Malaysian authorities generally co-operate with the UN High Commissioner for Refugees”.
Related Coverage
- Malaysian swap deal ruled unlawful The Daily Telegraph, 22 minutes ago
- High Court stops Malaysia deal Adelaide Now, 26 minutes ago
- Refugee ruling may not be clear-cut The Australian, 4 hours ago
- Court reserves decision on swap deal The Australian, 7 days ago
- It’s safe to expel kids, court hears The Daily Telegraph, 7 days a
Related articles
- High Court to decide on Malaysia deal (news.theage.com.au)
- Decision to send asylum-seekers to Malaysia will be made next week (iranianasylumseeker.wordpress.com)
- Court win won’t stop Malaysia deal fight (news.theage.com.au)
- Malaysia On Hold – High Court asked to review (godsmustardseed.com)
- Malaysia won’t protect asylum seekers: counsel (theage.com.au)
- People-smuggler law faces legal challenge in court today (theage.com.au)
- Fire at Darwin detention centre (news.theage.com.au)
- Sending minors to Malaysia ‘unlawful’ (news.theage.com.au)
- Limit to asylum seeker protection (theage.com.au)