Racial Discrimination in East and West Malaysia


Malaysia is split into east and west Malaysia. West is where I grew up and like many westies, when I think about Malaysia, I invariably think about west Malaysia. I often forget what it’s like in east Malaysia. This is unforgivable, seeing that I really liked places like Kuching, Miri and Sabah and that many of my great friends are from Sarawak. In fact, Sabah continues to give me great memories – mount KK was exciting and the islands at the TAR Park are gorgeous, as is the Karambrunai resort off Kota Kinabalu.

Just how different east Malaysia is from its cousins in the peninsular, came into apparent focus last Saturday night, when I met up with 2 other lawyers to chat about work and life in general. 1 of them was a Sarawakian and the other was a westie. When this westie and I talked about the discrimination we experienced in Malaysia, our eastern friend had a curious look on his face. It was apparent that he didn’t agree and thought it strange we should say that.

My father was a self-employed trader. In his younger days he’d ply his trade from a commercial vehicle, often a lorry or a commercial van. There was a chendol man (chendol is a Malaysian sweet dessert) who told me he could sell his chendol anywhere and not worry about local council enforcement agencies hounding him, as he was a Malay. If it was a Chinese selling noodles, there would be summons galore for sure. Ditto the Indian rojak seller (rojak is a Malaysian salad with spicy peanut sauce – mouth watering stuff). Whenever I buy my chendol from this Malay seller, I’d wonder what it was like when my father had to ply his trade on the streets, vending anything from soy and chilli sauce to toys and playing cards. Certainly my father in law constantly regaled how the Klang Council harass him over his textile shop on a constant basis, whereas the Malay foodstalls on the same street as his shop barely copped anything. Didn’t my east Malaysian friend on Saturday night experience this?

When I was in primary school, if you scored 5A’s in the primary assessment exam, you stood a chance of getting into a select school in the capital. We all knew in these schools, a Chinese would be totally out-numbered by Malays. A good friend of ours went there and confirmed that to be true, not that it needed verification. The big number Malay students tend to suggest there are many of them with 5As’ but we all knew if you were a Malay, you didn’t need 5A’s to get into those schools. Didn’t my east Malaysian friend on Saturday night experience this?

The primary school assessment exam was the first of many levels in school, where we learned we were different from the Malays not just in terms of the colour of our skin or the sort of food we ate. They could do things we couldn’t do, go places we couldn’t go. They were special. This differentiation went all the way to the University. Didn’t my east Malaysian friend on Saturday night experience this?

When I was in University in Sydney (UNSW), I stayed in various places, as each year I would seek out cheaper rooms or flats. In my final years, I found a really cheap place – in a dilapidated backroom on top of a shop. To go to the loo, I had to get out of my room, walk down a corridor and get into the flat. I had to work to pay for my fees and my board, cheap as it was. I worked on weekends in a fish market – did it for close to 6 years. Had to be in by 5am and worked through till 5-6 pm on Saturdays and often on Sundays as well. I delivered newspapers at 5.30 in the morning 3-4 times a week, on weekdays. In between classes, I worked in the University faculty doing odd jobs – in the print room, moving furniture, etc. I worked full time in a hospital as a ward assistant during each summer, while also holding down the fish market and newspaper delivery jobs. All through this, I knew a Malay guy who lived nearby. He was alone when I first met him. He later got married and had kids. He didn’t do any part time work. While I slogged away trying to make ends meet, he was busy having babies. I earned every penny while every one of his came from the Malaysian government. I think many of us know someone like this Malay friend of mine. Didn’t my east Malaysian friend on Saturday night experience this?

When I was working in Malaysia, I regularly drew up contracts for Chinese who used Malays to tender for contracts. Stock standard requirements in Malaysia. Every commercial lawyer in Malaysia has loan contracts, trust deeds, powers of attorney, transfer instruments, management agreements, shareholder agreements and all these other instruments locked away in a drawer somewhere, designed to protect the Chinese businessman who needed the Malay to open doors. They were known as the Ali Baba schemes. Didn’t my east Malaysian friend on Saturday night experience this?

As a lawyer in financial institutions in Malaysia, I had also had to draw up correspondence with regulators, either telling them we have the required minimum 30% Malay staff in a given level of management, or explaining why we didn’t. I had to sit in meetings where management had to agonize over paying Malay graduates just to fill the payrolls and report to the regulators. The Malaysian Securities Commission and the KL Stock Exchange had to be satisfied that you had enough Malay licensed dealers, before they agreed to issue licenses to non-Malay dealers. Every month I had to go over the reports and come up with the requisite correspondence with the regulators. Many securities dealing companies simply employ Malay graduates to fill up the quotas and as these “staff” could not be trusted to sit at the dealing board, they were asked to perform other tasks, including clerical tasks. Some don’t even bother to show up for work. This was true when I first got involved in the securities dealing industry in 1994 and when I left it in 2004. Didn’t my east Malaysian friend on Saturday night experience this?

When I was the Company secretary of a bank in Malaysia, I had to submit profiles of potential board candidates to Bank Negara, the regulator of banks in Malaysia. The forms invariably had Malay/Non Malay boxes which you had to tick. The more Malays you had on your board, the better you got on with the regulator, especially if these Malays were from the establishment, ie approved by the ruling party and its goons. Each board meeting is preceded by long talks about golf and women and trips abroad. They would come in their jacket and tie and know next to nothing about the industry. They wouldn’t take a second look at the minutes, resolutions, letters or contracts you drafted. They only needed a nod from their puppet masters in the ruling party to put their signatures down. In my present place, each director is an industry expert. Their contribution is quick, meaningful and weighty. They had to be interviewed by the company through a selection process. The draft you gave them would be circulated and re-worked through half a dozen times before all are happy to sign, and it all takes 2-3 days. That imbecile in that Malaysian bank would probably have taken the whole week to get to speak to his master, before returning the document to you without any questions asked, signature grandiosely and artistically penned. Why were these buffoons there? Simply because they are Malays. Didn’t my east Malaysian friend on Saturday night experience this?

The list goes on – subsidised housing, scholarships, promotions, I once foolishly got into an argument with a Malay in a parking lot. Over a car park space, obviously. I was so incensed at his “holier than thou, you migrant” attitude I told him there wasn’t yet a Malay quota for car parks, and walked off without giving in. The discrimination is so pervasive in the peninsular I wonder how my east Malaysian friend could have denied it. Maybe it is very different in the east.

Gardener Lies Again


We don’t like P Kenyon at Man United. So when we get a chance to whack one over him, the temptation is almost always too good to pass. So now I think I found one. He has now said Chelsea’s problems – on and off the field – is now behind them. But we all thought everything was fine – P Kenyon said so himself!

I guess Kenyon would always remain the slimeball double dealing toothpick that he has proven himself to be.

So it WAS the Oil


John Howard the Prime Minister has done it again – he has pulled off another act to add to his “Honest John” reputation.

I first heard him speak when he was in the Opposition over 20 years ago, bushy eyebrows and all. His forte was his honesty and he really came across as someone you can trust, certainly a lot more than his opponents at that time, Andrew Peacock internally and Bob Hawke on the other side.

Of course honesty doesn’t always make you look good, as in the case of a murderer, for example, who confesses. This sort of honesty doesn’t exculpate. Unfortunately for the PM, this time it is this sort of honesty. He has now admitted to ganging up with Bush and Blair against Iraq to secure oil supply. I think he’s the first to so admit. Blair has stepped down, and Bush will too, soon. According to polls here, Howard will, before the year is out, join these alumni of ex-leaders who ganged up against and wrecked Iraq. However I don’t recall the other two admitting to oil supply as a reason for the terrible war.

Elections are due this year (and I have to vote – it is compulsory here) and many have assumed Labour under Kevin Rudd will romp in. Rudd is a bit of a Blair type – a smooth and suave communicator but not always solid on substance. Unfortunately there is no Gordon Brown in the Australian version of New Labour. In fact there aren’t too many solid candidates in Rudd’s shadow line-up (though not quite Malaysian cabinet standard, not by any means) so I’m not sure why Labour is ahead in the polls and is expected to win. I certainly don’t see the equivalents of a Costello or a Turnbull.

I don’t know if John Howard’s latest act of honesty was driven by any attempt to regain lost electoral grounds. Maybe he is going to announce the elections soon. I haven’t read the context of the admission as I only caught one of those Beeb one-liner news items (see earlier entry). I will of course, look it up and there will no doubt be op-ed pieces on it in the next few days. The interesting thing is the openness of a leader who has again demonstrated that doing the right thing in the here and now has its place, no matter how much damage has been done in the past. Maybe it is a sort of confession on his part, knowing his days are now numbered. Either way, there’s a lesson somewhere for some leaders in other parts of the world.

Another Nail in the Coffin


I was in Malaysia in December 2006, not long after the explosive matter of the murdered Mongolian translator hit the newsstands.  Within a space of a couple of dinners with some friends and old colleagues, it became obvious that there was more than meet the eye and as usual, it involved allegations of wanton abuse of power by powerful public figures who think of themselves more as feudal lords than public servants. All the dirt is coming out now, as the murder trials of the piñatas take on their usual farcical course. The star witness of the prosecution is now a victim of prosecution impeachment proceedings. A significant but previously absent piece of evidence has suddenly emerged in the form of a mysterious man and his vehicle, elements totally unreported before. It is as though an author of a bad script has suddenly inserted a brand new act into this comic tragedy. Comical in that the shenanigans of the legal fraternity of Malaysia have become a joke which has long turned into a source of annoyance, nay a scourge, to the frustrated public. While Malaysians used to laugh at the “irrelevant” remarks of Augustine Paul the high court judge, they now face the prospect of having a totally ineffectual and irrelevant judiciary and public prosecutor’s office and so can no longer afford to laugh. It is more obviously a tragedy on at least two fronts. The emotional storms the family of the victim must be going through, are sins for which the perpetrators of this heinous crime would hopefully, at least grieve over if not severely punished. The other tragedy is the continuing degradation of the sense accountability and law enforcement/public order machineries which has plagued Malaysia for so long. Malaysians are fast losing any hope of salvaging its public institutions and the sense of what’s right. Nothing short of deliberate and concerted public meetings to strongly and aggressively voice total disaffection would do.

Can we both be right?


I was just chatting with someone earlier today and the issue of religious dogmas surfaced again. A few days ago a couple of high profile terrorist attacks took place in Britain, in London and Glasgow, Following the Glasgow one (a couple of twenty-something medical doctors loaded up an SUV with petrol and crashed into the Glasgow airport), a couple of medical doctors from the middle east were detained in Brisbane. Both were working as doctors in a Gold Coast hospital, both are Muslims with one of them having Palestinian parents and was himself born in Jordan. He may have been an Indian. Anyway, we were talking about this piece of news and someone remarked why so much violence emanates from religions. Someone else retorted that was because religions create bigotry, especially religions which insist they are right and everyone else is wrong. Exclusivity is always a bad idea for societies trying to find ways to live together more harmoniously.

That is a problem isn’t it – the world insisting no one should be dogmatic and claim exclusive ownership over truth. Religions, in my mind, are necessarily dogmatic. Why set down principles of relating to God and the consequential rules for this and the after life, if you don’t believe them to be true? In fact you shouldn’t just believe them to be true you have to believe they are the only ones which are true. If you don’t, if others are also true, why start something new? Why not just use the other, pre-existing one? After all, one isn’t talking about building a better model of say, a car or a computer or a phone, because newer or better models of those tools make those tools even more effective. Essentially a car is to get you from point A to point B and you make a newer model only because it brings you from point A to point B either faster, or in more comfort or safer or using less fuel. You don’t make a new car for any other reason, do you? Or maybe you do but surely that is just consumerism gone mad (as in having fifty varieties of margarine on the supermarket shelves) and has nothing to do with making sure you get from point A to point B, because the old beat-up whatever does exactly that already.

My point is, when one starts a new religion, surely the motivation must be the idea that all the other religions don’t bring you to God, that some aspects of their teachings are not quite right with the result that you may not reach God? Man seeking God isn’t exactly like finding different ways to eat chocolates and that discovering another way is always a plus. If religion A already lets you find God, you don’t start religion B unless A didn’t actually let you find God. If merely parts of A were problematic but you still got to God anyway, wouldn’t religion B then be false if it didn’t contain those bits of A which did get you to God? And if A did get you to God, shouldn’t those problematic bits be fixed but didn’t matter anyway because you still got to God via A? Why start B? I’d be pretty disappointed with a God who doesn’t have a set of standards, for whom anything goes. If God wants us to come to Him, He’d set down a way and that’d be it. I guess I’m trying to say truth in religion is necessarily exclusive. If A is true then everything else must be false. If there’s something else which is true, then A must have been false. I’ve heard this described as an “either or” principle, as opposed to a “both and” principle. I think my point is especially focused if you agree that often, A and B actually say very different things. So, they cant be both right and they cant both get you to God. I guess you can call me an “either or” person and if that makes me a religiously dogmatic exclusionist bigot, well…that’s not so nice but I guess I’m in that sense, one.

Living


I woke up a full 25 minutes later than I intended this morning, so I missed the gym. I had felt I needed to, to get the week kick-started. It was such a long week last week and I was so bushed that on Friday night, the last thing I wanted to do was to be in church for a long night of movie and fraternizing. Oh I know I shouldn’t use that word but on that night I really felt that way. Any form of socializing, unless it is with a very small group over a warm meal and a few bottles of very good red, was to be avoided. Anyway there I was, in the church hall on a cold and tired Friday night, watching this movie called One Night with the King. It was on the story of Esther of the Old Testament. The sound was a bad, as obviously it felt like one of those cheap movie sessions Malaysian schools used to organize – the hall wasn’t meant to the a theater and it showed. We ploughed through the 120 odd minutes of celluloid, after which we worked our way through cakes and other delights totally unsuited for such a late hour. Despite all that, it felt good to be in the company of church friends so as tired as I was it was not a totally bad way to end the week.

Saturday was therefore the start of my recuperation from the week, including the events of the previous night. I was particularly looking forward to it as we were supposed to look at a couple of houses which we had seen on the internet. As it turned out, one was a dud and the other has been sold, but that was only one part of a damp squib of a weekend. After the usual house cleaning, we dropped kiddo off at her morning class (final one, with at least a few months’ break). After replenishing my wine stock, we went off all the way to Wantirna South, for the first inspection. The internet copy writer was extremely skillful, for what was a small unit stuck behind another one occupied by very messy owner/occupier was given a description like it was a Taj Mahal perched on the Cote d’Azur going for a song. We left the house, dropped off the dry cleaning, picked up some bread and went to pick kiddo. After lunch with her, we went to do the weekly shopping, after which we headed home. I fixed up the wiring for the home phone (a new set with an answering machine, which Theresa picked up from the recent Myer stock-take sale). The made-in-China electrical extension cord was a challenge and by the time I was done it was time to go look for the second house, which turned out to have been sold the previous day already. I was peeved at the agent for making us go to the property, when she knew it has been sold. If it was to lure us to see other property it failed, because I don’t think I would want to deal with her again. That property was so close to kiddo’s present school so we were really keen on it but then again I know God has His ways of dealing with us.

We went home and it was nearly 5pm but we weren’t hungry so we watched a DVD – Stranger Than Fiction starring Will Ferrell and Emma Thompson. Dustin Hoffman played a role as well, in what was a very novel plot. Will Ferrell played an IRS agent, Harold Crick who lived a regimented life. His life was actually written as a fiction by Karen Eiffel (Emma Thompson). Their paths somehow crossed when Crick started hearing Eiffel’s narratives of his life. He thought he was going cuckoo, saw a shrink, who referred him to a Professor Jules Hilbert (Hoffman) who worked with Crick to unravel what was going on. It turned out Eiffel was writing a tragedy and she usually kills of her dramatis personae. Crick was waiting to be killed of but fortunately for him Eiffel had a writer’s block when it came to the ending. She struggled as Crick’s life took a turn for the better. One of his assignments took him to an Anna something (Mary Gyllenghall) and they hit it off after a rocky start. Eiffel finally had her writer’s block cleared up and found a way to kill her guy. By then Crick had figured out it was Eiffel who was writing his life and managed to contact her. He got her outline of a script, gave it to Hilbert, who thought it was a poetic and most beautiful ending so Crick should opt to go this way, rather than a mundane death albeit much later. He thought the book (titled Death and Taxes) could end no other way. The brave Crick went ahead and lived the final moments of his life exactly how Eiffel wanted. Except of course, Eiffel had struggled with the idea that her character was real and she was killing a real person so unbeknownst to Crick, changed the ending which saved Crick. Hilbert of course thought the ending spoiled it, thought the book would have been much better had Crick died as per the original version. It was a strange movie, but enjoyable.

We finished the movie just before 7, I cooked some vermicelli for dinner, after which we did something we hadn’t done for a long time. We caved in to kiddo’s pestering and played monopoly. She won, we lost, she was happy and we went to bed. Yesterday afternoon after church kiddo had lunch with the youth group followed by a jam session so Theresa and I went for lunch on our own. We went to Shangrila Inn at Brentford square – she for her char koay teow and I had my laksa. We went window shopping at Forest Hill after that before we went home and I did some ironing and cooked some more, for this week’s dinners. I also boiled some red beans for supper. SBS had a EPL classic match on where United thrashed the tractor boys 9-0 with Andy Cole scoring 5. It was great to see Giggsy turning the Ipswich defense upside down for half if not all of the goals. I wondered again if United would be better next season than they were. With Hargreaves, and the two latin dancers they should but one never knows. Maybe Anfield would be more threatening this time around. Apparently they are close to signing Spain’s Torres for over 26 million GBP…

And so it was a very uneventful weekend, but great because it had loads of family time. It was also great because yesterday morning, I found myself really getting stuck into acknowledging God and worshiping him. That echoed again this morning just by listening to some songs on an SD card which I thought had gone walkabout. I found it again yesterday and the songs on it (Amy Grant mainly) were inspiring stuff. It drained the battery on the phone but just listening to music about worship for a change (instead of reading) was great. Mundane stuff huh? Living, I guess.

Just Do It, Mins


Many would have read Kit Siang’s entry on the alleged JAWI heroics in an eatery in Bangsar. While the reaction has been predictably hot under the collar, it is just another piece in the big picture of the government thinking minority Malaysians would always just cower and do what Harry Lee Kuan Yew said Malays in Malaysia expect of the minority – Ya Tuan. If the minority groups in Malaysia are fed up and want to put an end to this nonsense, they have to rise up and stand up to these idiots for who they are – idiotic bigots.

Eric Chia Merry Circus


Someone emailed me today, saying Eric has been acquited of all those charges he was charged with, in relation to one of the biggest corporate scandals involving government funds. The typical Malaysian would shrugh his shoulders and ask what else is new. Billions of dollars down the proverbial tube. Billions of dollars lost to ordinary Malaysians. many of whom are struggling everyday to put food on the table.

I ask again – are ordinary Malaysians going to ever care enough to rise up and make themselves heard?

Careful now, Malaysia


The recent church demolition in Gua Musang in Malaysia is a bit of a wreck in terms of government protection of the minority. It is another piece of evidence that the Malaysian government does not care about its minority rights, including (or especially?) religious rights. I would not be the least bit surprised if there was even tacit approval and connivance. A properly constructed building for religious purposes was recklessly wrecked by local government running amok and what did the government do, despite advanced warning by a national para-church organisation which has a relatively consistent, cogent and strong voice? Zilch. Maybe the head of government was busy preparing for his wedding and the religious rights of a few church goers, and orang asli at that, were of the least consequence. After all, the signal was already sent by way of the Federal Court decision in Lina Joy. The last I checked, Christians number 2% in Malaysia. What’s the population of Malaysia now – 26 million? That makes Christians what – 520,000? Hindus are another group with similarly affected, with numerous places of worship summarily demolished. What’s the population of Hindus in Malaysia? Approximating Hindu population to that of Indians, on a very rough estimate Hindu and Christian population in Malaysia total just under 2 million. What if the religious sentiments of this very considerable group rises and borders on the dangerous, given the Muslim majority government’s attitudes towards wanton destruction of churches and temples? Can the Malaysian government risk an uprising of 2 million people? Christians and Hindus are peace loving people and unlike Muslims, they have a far less tendency to resort to emotional and violent reaction. That does not mean however, that they would continue to do nothing if these acts of bullying and persecution continue. Witness what happened in Indonesia and northern and western India – it shows no matter how peace loving someone is, push him around hard enough and he’d react. The Malaysian government should think clearly and understand where this line is before it is crossed. It’d be stupid of them to ignore this. But then again, that would not be something new.

Drama in Melb CBD


There was high drama in the Melbourne CBD this morning. We were having our weekly Monday morning team meeting, when my boss took a call about the incident. A bar scuffle near the courtyard of the Rialto building had turned ugly and a man in his 20s fired several shots, killing one and critically wounding another two. It happened around 8.30am and by noon, the perpetrator was still on the run. Over lunch, I looked at the Age’s site and it said the incident had started in the bar as early as 6am. This is ridiculous – why are these people in a bar at 6am on a Monday morning? It sounded like a recipe for trouble at the very least, and a disaster as it turned out. Maybe these were shift workers who had just finished work and were having a few drinks. I still don’t get it – at 6am it was 7 deg. I know because I felt stupid in my shorts waiting in my car a few minutes before 6, begging for the gym to open so that I could dash in. The radio had announced the temperature and it was 7 degrees. In that condition, had I been a shift worker, I would have hurried home for a hot shower and bed, or maybe a hot coffee. But a bar? Even someone with a propensity for self inebriation such as yours truly, thinks this a farce.

The Rialto is on the western end of the city. I didn’t know if there were any museums in that part of the CBD so when I remembered that kiddo was supposed to be on a train a little after 9 with a group from school, heading into the city for a museum excursion, I had a momentary panic. I emailed Theresa for the details of the excursion. She didn’t know. I called the school and was put through to the principal, who assured me she has been in contact with the police, who would remain in touch with her. They were heading to the Parliament station, which is on the Spring Street – the eastern end of the CBD. I felt a little safer but the thought of an enraged and possibly intoxicated gunman on the loose in the city made me nervous throughout the day. Theresa and I kept trying to call kiddo on her mobile every half an hour or so, to no avail. At around 4pm, I had an email from Theresa saying they had actually cancelled the trip. Barely half an hour after getting into the city, they took the next train out of the city and headed back to school. The education minister had jumped in to interfere by cancelling all school excursions into the city. Curiously enough, my first reaction was that kiddo was going to be disappointed. There was another occasion when they went into the city and someone took a fall, hurt her head and the whole group had to return to school. Again, a zero risk tolerance may have caused disappointment but safety first obviously prevailed.